VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]
Subject: the West Lothian question


Author:
Ian (Australia)
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 15:26:52 10/22/04 Fri
In reply to: Ed Harris (Venezia) 's message, "English independence..." on 12:40:14 10/22/04 Fri

"What is it?"

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> Subject: Answer


Author:
Dave (UK)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:40:29 10/22/04 Fri

The original question was posed by Scottish Labour MP Tam Dalyell, whose constituency used to be called West Lothian.

The essential point is this:

How can it could be right that a Scottish MP at Westminster can vote on matters only affecting English seats, but that same MP could not vote on such matters affecting his own constituency because they are devolved issues, in which the Scottish Parliament has authority.

The question is well-known, but we have yet to hear an answer.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: ah, *that* West Lothian question


Author:
Ian (Australia)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:59:06 10/22/04 Fri

I tend to think that Jim's answer is a good one.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: True federation is the answer


Author:
Jim (Canada)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:51:23 10/22/04 Fri


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Indeed, but...


Author:
Dave (UK)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:00:22 10/22/04 Fri

A true federal system would indeed resolve the issue. Unfortunately, this is not being offered. In fact the Government are campaigning as we speak on a referendum to create more devolution in England. At last, an English Parliament I hear you say? Well no, they want to fragment and regionalise England, and the referendum shortly is to create an Assembly for the North-East.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: If the North East sees itself as a region and wants to govern itself, fine


Author:
Ian (Australia)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:05:19 10/22/04 Fri

But the same opportunity should be available to all self-defined regions

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: England becoming "independent" of Scotland is like the USA becoming "independent" of Puerto Rico! NT


Author:
misnomer!
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:52:03 11/02/04 Tue


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.