VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123456789[10] ]
Subject: Looks good


Author:
Ian (Australia)
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 16:04:07 10/22/04 Fri
In reply to: Jim (Canada) 's message, "Here is how the FC Parliament would look by Region based on rep by pop" on 14:57:40 10/22/04 Fri

I have no desire to "break England up". I think it would be good if regions that define themselves as regions had the opportunity to govern themselves at provincial level. If no such regions exist, so be it.

I rather imagine that Cornwall might like provincial status and, being a sentimental bugger, I would be strongly inclined to say "good on them".

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: More Subdivision


Author:
Benjamin Simpson (Australia)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:12:08 10/22/04 Fri

England 272
Scotland 28
Wales 17
Northern Ireland 11
Newfoundland & Labrador 3
Prince Edward Island 5
Nova Scotia 1
New Brunswick 4
Quebec 42
Ontario 67
Manitoba 7
Saskatchewan 6
Alberta 18
British Columbia 22
Yukon 1
Northwest Territories 1
Nunavut 1
New South Wales 37
Victoria 25
Queensland 20
Western Australia 10
South Australia 8
Tasmania 3
Northern Territory 1
New Zealand 22
Jamica 15
Trinidad and Tobago 6
The Bahamas 2
West Indies 3
PNG 30
Dependent Territories 3
Total 683
I notice there is no mention of the South Pacific.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: How did Trinidad and Tobago get in there?


Author:
Ian (Australia)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:26:51 10/22/04 Fri

We have to limit ourselves at least to the Crown Commonwealth.

And, since the idea (at least for me) is to work for a federation of essentially "british" countries, I don't see Papua New Guinea as being relevant. If we are talking about common culture and values, then there is very very little to work with there.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.