VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]678910 ]
Subject: and...


Author:
Dave (UK)
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 21:28:23 12/08/04 Wed
In reply to: Ed Harris (Venezia) 's message, "Addendum #2" on 17:06:59 12/08/04 Wed

When I fly down to London, I often pay less for the flight than the rail connection from Stansted to Liverpool Street!

Work that one out...

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: This is the age of the train....


Author:
Nick (UK)
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:15:27 12/17/04 Fri

Maintaining thousands of miles of ageing track and rural stations is more expensive than maintaining a few subsidised runways and departure lounges and using untaxed aviation fuel, and the more commercial and competitive operations of the low-cost fliers use exremely low advance teaser rates and last-minute deals to keep passenger numbers up, since an empty seat is almost as expensive to get in the air as an occupied one. However in real terms, railways are probably more cost efficient than flight for getting people from A to B, and certainly have a lot more capacity.

I don't know what the answer is. I think we should invest in a modern highspeed backbone, but the truth is that other European countries that have this tend to either price most of the population out of the new services (Spain), or run quite low quality or non-existent local services. Britain has the second largest railway network in Europe, and one of the largest in the world, despite our small size geographically. We have only marginally fewer miles of track then Germany, despite that country's extra 20m souls and significantly larger land area. This is expensive, but it's also a valuable asset that shouldn't be squandered.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.