Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Change

Author: Nick (UK)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 13:21:25 12/17/04 Fri In reply to: Dave (UK) 's message, "The whole reorganisation stems from the MoD's Defence Review white paper" on 13:10:19 12/17/04 Fri I'm not happy about losing regiments, but change has always been necessary in the armed forces, and has always happened. The important thing is that the military is made more effective for its future role rather than less. That's up to the 'experts' at the MoD to try to achieve, within the limited resources that a peacetime society is willing to spend. It was ever thus. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]