Hm. -- FCS Discussion Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Hm.

Author:
Ed Harris (Venezia)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:42:20 11/26/04 Fri
In reply to: Owain (UK) 's message, "conflicting definitions" on 14:33:02 11/26/04 Fri

I won't be convinced. Imperialism was an ethos, not a set of actions. I don't care if even the OED contradicts me: in this context, I know better!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: too specific
Author: Owain (UK) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 16:30:08 11/26/04 Fri I think your looking for something to specific in the meaning of imperialism. When words are too specific we have to invent new words. [ Post a Reply to This Message ]