Re: 1.1.1 -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6 ]

Subject: Re: 1.1.1

Author:
Di

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:35:24 05/31/03 Sat
In reply to: Ali 's message, "Re: 1.1.1" on 15:27:22 05/29/03 Thu

Oooh, I want to take part in the Teletubbies Tap Dance!!!!

Actually at Manchester we once actually had a Teletubbies Offbeat routine. It never made it to IVDC but it did make it to the GM Comp.......

>I would like to propose some additions to the IVDC
>format:
>
>Advanced Morris Dance
>Intermediate Ballet
>Novice Conga
>Open Basic Dance Like Micheal Jackson
>A & Ex Teletubbies Tap Dance
>BCD Pole-dancing
>Beginners' Hand Jive
>
>I think some of the existing events should be removed
>to give us time for this. IVDA is about promoting
>dance. We do far too much of all this ballroom & Latin
>rubbish - how lop-sided is that? In order to follow
>our Prime Directive we should scrap most of this
>Dancesport crap and put a more balanced selection of
>dances. This is what the most important clause in the
>constitution mandates us to do, so we must do it.
>
>
>This is, of course, impossible.
>
>
>1.1.1 is clearly and grossly unrepresentative of what
>IVDA is and should be. It should be changed
>immediately.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]