Re: Meeting Proposal -- universitydancesport.com forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6 ]

Subject:

Re: Meeting Proposal

Author:
Thinking clearly

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:14:11 06/01/03 Sun
In reply to: :) 's message, "Re: Meeting Proposal" on 09:39:32 05/30/03 Fri

>If you can't go to the GCM you can't expect a say in
>the constitution. Send a representative or a written
>statement.

If you pay your IVDA fees, you should have a say in the constitution. There are any number of good reasons a member might not be able to make it to a given meeting.

From comments here, it seems that Cambridge did send both a representative, who wasn't one of their offbeat team, and a written response from their offbeat team to the agenda point. If something completely different to what is on the agenda is proposed, it is right and proper that is should be subject to the same criticism as any other proposal, after the meeting if necessary, and not pushed through by the back door.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]