Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Vintage 3D -- Atticwindow TH, 08:48:13 04/17/10 Sat

I always thought "vintage" meant "old". I didn't know it actually meant "huge tits".

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Vintage 3D -- John MacAckRack, 14:47:37 04/17/10 Sat

>I always thought "vintage" meant "old".

OK, point of order Mr. Senator;
The model in the post with the subject "Vintage 3D" photos is in her 80's or 90's now, if she's still alive. So there's no doubt in my mind that they can be qualitatively termed 'vintage.' The subject of the following post was "not so vintage DD's" indicating both newer image and larger breasts.

I posted the vintage photos, in point of fact, to try and add some less busty [or breast centric images, as my therapist calls them] figures to address shortcomings pointed out by the comment "Everything on this board seems to already be double-Ds anyway. 3D is just overkill."

So... you can't please all of the people, all of the time. And I have to keep Frank happy, or he'll write another letter. About Obama forcing cheap healthcare that costs so much yet won't even pay for simple breast implants. Hmmmm, I'm beginning to understand the tea party's appeal. And Sarah's got a rack on her. I wonder what she'd look like in 3D [remember... that's my room number at the cheap hotel.]

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Vintage 3D Palin -- John Mac3D, 18:41:54 04/17/10 Sat

Ladies and Gentlemen [or surly loser types, you know who you are];
I present for your entertainment, for the first time anywhere: vintage 3d Sarah Palin

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Vintage 3D Palin -- Mike P, 23:09:13 04/17/10 Sat

>

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Vintage 3D Palin -- Frank, 14:02:58 04/18/10 Sun

I would love sit inside her, but
>wouldn't trust her to get me where I have to go.

I really don't see any "getting where you have to go" in the disturbing image that last sentence created.
Just a lot of "Please get off! I can't breathe!" and death.
And the sex doesn't end then.
Oh God, it doesn't end then.









But it's quieter.
Believe me, I'd love to do a quiet Sarah Palin.










Or a talkative Michael Palin.









Anbd Spam.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Vintage 3D Palin -- Mike P, 01:21:45 04/21/10 Wed


>
>Anbd Spam.

Spam jelly can be used as a lubricant in an emergency.




Just sayin.




If the Sarah Palin thing didn't make Franks
head explode, the image of this, should just
about do it....3-2-1....

[ Edit | View ]