Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

view it like this:




then try again

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Atticwindow TH, 19:12:30 04/12/10 Mon

>Just so you know, I am currently failing in my ability
>to make the 3d connection. I am usually pretty good
>with the ones that look like nothing, then the image
>resolves. For some reason, I can'rt do it with those
>images.\
>
>Maybe I just don't want naked women in 3d, or any d
>for that matter.

Everything on this board seems to already be double-Ds anyway. 3D is just overkill.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Frank, 07:12:22 04/13/10 Tue

3D is just overkill.


But what a way to go!

[ Edit | View ]

[> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- John Mac3D, 22:09:16 04/12/10 Mon

OK. That's true. I have been posting the most exaggerated figures of the nude models. It just kinda evolved that way organ-ically. But these are true stereoscopic images. And if you can look at the left image with your left eye and right image with your right eye, you will see depth. Although you will be shallower aesthetically speaking. But it's a pain in the ass to prepare images like this if they weren't actually shot in stereo. So if it's just me and Frank; it's not really worth keeping up the 3D theme. I did shoot a bunch of 3D film and video 15 and 20 years ago using a beam splitter which puts two images on a single piece of film or videotape. I still have the old footage. But it's not easy to watch when it's not anaglyph style with the red and blue glasses.

Here's a quicktime clip, but it'll only work if you can make the eye shift thing happen.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- A bunch of other guys, 07:15:05 04/13/10 Tue

So if it's just me and Frank;
>it's not really worth keeping up the 3D theme.


Hey, us bunch of guys can see this 3D thing.
Keep up the good work.
I...we like seeing the buxon models in 3D.
I..We don't know what we'd do if rthose models were to disappear. We'd probably get our gun...guns and shoot up our workplace...workplaces. Then we'd go to jail and have anal sex...sexes.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Cliff, 10:24:02 04/13/10 Tue


Frank Johnson is right.

Just because I can't get the 3D thing to work, it just means that I see 4 tits, instead of two.

I choose to see this as a positive thing.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- artie, 14:21:21 04/13/10 Tue

>
>Frank Johnson is right.
>
>Just because I can't get the 3D thing to work, it just
>means that I see 4 tits, instead of two.
>
>I choose to see this as a positive thing.




...I, for one would like to see and end to the 3D, this board started shallow and that's how it should stay...



...douchebags...

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Cliff, 14:35:32 04/13/10 Tue

The funny thing is that Artie used to dance under the name of Shallow Douchebags.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Mike P, 16:31:38 04/13/10 Tue

>The funny thing is that Artie used to dance under the
>name of Shallow Douchebags.

OH shit!
That was Artie, I thought it was a broad with
a hairy back, I never did see the front of her/him,
there were a bunch of Shriners occupying her/his time.

On the plus side, he did make about a grand that afternoon.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Brian, 18:10:05 04/13/10 Tue

fogete 3D!?!? 3d is the the wave of the future! Everything will soon be in 3d, and I'm not just talking about the world (which always was). All media will be in HD 3d, even radio! It's coming!

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Artie, 19:21:50 04/13/10 Tue

>>The funny thing is that Artie used to dance under the
>>name of Shallow Douchebags.
>
>OH shit!
>That was Artie, I thought it was a broad with
>a hairy back, I never did see the front of her/him,
>there were a bunch of Shriners occupying her/his time.
>
>On the plus side, he did make about a grand that
>afternoon.



...Thank you Michael, that was thoughtful and amusing.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Frank, 07:11:25 04/14/10 Wed

> ...Thank you Michael, that was thoughtful and
>amusing.


Thank you, Shoe-Shine Boy, you're humble and lovable.

[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Re: Are Frank and I alone, on the board, in this thing??! -- Undie-Dog, 12:01:39 04/14/10 Wed

>> ...Thank you Michael, that was thoughtful and
>>amusing.
>
>
>Thank you, Shoe-Shine Boy, you're humble and lovable.

Bless you sir.

[ Edit | View ]