VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:12:15 02/15/17 Wed
Author: Knut Holt
Subject: The Lufthansa Plane Crash on Mars 2015 - an alternative explanation

The Lufthansa Tragedy on 24 Mars 2015 - an alternative explanation

On 24 March 2015, an Airbus A320-211, belonging to Lufthansa, crashed 100 kilometres (62 mi) north-west of Nice in the French Alps, after constantly descending from normal cruice altitude, just one minute after a routine contact with flight controle, resulting in 144 passengers and six crew members killed.

The official explanation is that the copilot, which had some mental and domestic problems, ditched the plane purposedly after having locked the door to the cabin for the chief pilot that was out for a toilet visit.

But the official explanation may not be true. The only moment in that explanation that seems to be sure is that the pilot was out of the cabin and struggled to get inside again.

Here is a possible alternative explanantion for this terrible tragedy.

The plane collided with some object, possibly a meteorite or even more possibly with a surveillance drone that was out of controle. There are plenty of those secret drones in the sky nowadays, bot of course nobody will admit they are there.

The plane got injured, but it was not clear how bad the damages were in the first place. The captain went out to the passenger cabin to acertain the situation there.

The copilot locked the cabin door as a security routine, something he was obliged to do, and intended to open it again when the captain went back.

In the meantime the air pressure in the pilot cabin fell dramatically due to the injuries the plane had sustained.

The copilot that now had the responsibility for the flight dived the plane in order to get to a lower altitude with higher air pressure.

When the captain tried to open the door to get into the pilot cabin again, it was impossible due to pressure differances between the passenger cabin and pilot cabin, and possibly also due to other damages. It may also be that the copilot already had lost consciousness due to pressure fall in the cabin and was not able to open.

At some point the copilot in either case lost consciousmess and hence controle over the plane, or the plane was not able to controle due to damages.

Then the plane crashed into a mountain.

There were immediat effords going on to put the blame on the tragedy on the copilot with allegations he dived the plane deliberatedly in a combined homicide and suicide action.

The fact that the blame for the tragedy so early was put on the copilot is by itself a sign that there is some secret ingredient involved in the tragedy, most probably some secret aereal vehicle, of which existense one never will admit.

Knut Holt
For smart information about disease cures, fitness boost and sex techiques, please see his website

http://www.abicana.com/health_information.htm



Jeg er ikke sikker på at jeg kjøper den foklaringen vi fores med. Det at en så tidlig prøver å legge skylden på annenpiloten virker muggent og tyder på at en prøver å skjule noe, eller er blitt pålagt å skjule noe. Her er en annen forklaring: Flyet kan ha fått en skade på grunn av kollisjon med et objekt, hvorav en hemmelig overvåknibgsdrone er en mulighet. Så kan kapteinen ha gått ut i pasasjerkabinen for å sjekke tilstanden der. Deretter kan trykket i pilotkabinen ha falt drastisk, og annenpiloten kan ha dykker flyet for å komme ned til en høyde med høyere trykk, men mistet bevisstheten og kontrollen på flyet. Trykkforrskjellen mellom pilotkabinen og passasjerkabinen eller andre skader kan ha gjort det vanskelig for kapteinen å åpne døra og komme tilbake til pilotkabinen.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.