Why did the RAF remove old wreckage but not more recent wreckage? -- The Landing Ground

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

Subject: Why did the RAF remove old wreckage but not more recent wreckage?

Author:
Chrisj

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:08:10 09/11/05 Sun

Hi there, can anyone answer this question?

why did the RAF remove the wreckage of an Anson in 1939 but not remove the wreckage of a Vampire in 1953? Both sites are very close to each other in the Brecon Beacons and if they were able to remove wreckage in 1939 why did they choose to leave the Vampire wreckage there in 1953? Don't get me wrong, I think that these crash sites should remain where they are and not be disturbed but I find it odd why this is.

regards
Chrisj

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]