RETCONS -- The Fly Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: :-) RETCONS

Author:
Greg

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:35:50 11/06/01 Tue

The Fly II should not be considered canon with Cronenberg's film. It "retcons" a number of things. Are we now to believe that GENIUS Seth Brundle really worked with the evil Anton Bartok without noticing that HE WAS EVIL? Did Saffron Henderson portray Ronnie in the first film instead of Geena Davis? Did the telepods really make those new opening/closing noises in the first film? Did Ronnie really videotape Brundle's explaination ("A fly...got into the...transmitter pod that first time when I was alone...")

According to The Fly II, the answer to all of these is "yes". BAH!!!!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: RETCONS
Author: Mutronborg [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 06:13:44 11/15/01 Thu sits in the audience, vomits into his popcorn and sucks it up "BUZZZ!!!" = "YEAH" [ Post a Reply to This Message ]