Re: Babies are not puppies -- Talking Circle Alternative

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, 01/29/03 1:20am
Author: tash"ana
Subject: Re: Babies are not puppies
In reply to: one paper kid 's message, "Re: Babies are not puppies" on Tue, 01/28/03 1:44pm

>True, babies are not puppies, but that was NOT the
>question posed. You seem very cynical in your answer,
>were YOU the snotty 13 year old throwing things
>against the wall? Did your parents raise YOU in what
>such a way that YOU felt unloved or abused? Kangi is
>a VERY GOOD PERSON, and would not concieve a child,
>only to place them in a situation as you describe, or
>possibly have experienced.... If you must be cynical,
>start your own post, I'm sure it will be given the
>attention it deserves.... YOU owe Kangi an apology
>for your remarks!

OPK:

Are you a personal friend of Kangi's? Do you eat dinner together once a week? What you know is what you have seen on an internet message board. I thought that lagirl's observations were good ones, and something that EVERYONE should consider when thinking about children.

If I remember correctly, Kangi already has a kid, so not all of the observations apply, but some do. There is nothing wrong with advising someone to think about things. As for the "too old" question, it could be taken several different ways. You saw it as strictly a physical health question, I guess? I didn't see it that way.

Anyway, I have some remarks of my own to make, which I will do further down this thread.

lagirl:

don't know you, do I?
welcome.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]