VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:20:39 05/13/03 Tue
Author: Mr John D Clare
Subject: Was the NEP a success
In reply to: 's message, "NEP" on 01:11:54 05/13/03 Tue

This is a good question.
Section 1:
In some ways the NEP was a success:
1. It helped the Bolshevik government survive the problems of 1921 – there were no new revolts, and the government was able to establish itself securely in power.
2. It made the peasants and small traders happy – gave them a little more money in their pockets.
3. It stimulated production, which went back to 1913 levels.
4. It helped the country recover from the Civil War.
5. It produced more food – in 1921 there had been a famine; by 1923 there was enough food going into the towns.

Section 2:
But in other ways it was a huge failure:
a. It caused splits in the Communist Party – many Bolsheviks resigned. In his leadership struggle with Trotsky, Stalin was able to use these splits to seize power.
b. It was a massive ideological retreat. During ‘War Communism’ Russia had been governed by pure Communist ideals. The NEP allowed free enterprise and personal profit – it was almost an admission that Communism did not work.
c. It fed the existing population, but it did not provide the ‘agricultural revolution’ that was needed to support a huge growth in Russia’s population, industry and power.
d. It did not produce extra food for sale abroad – and Russia needed to generate income to spend on investment in industry.
e. The did not stimulate the investment and modernisation that was needed – the Russian economy remained poor and backward compared with western countries.
f. The kulaks grew rich – and they resisted strenuously when Stalin tried to collectivise the farms.
g. Conditions for the proletariat (working class in the towns) did not improve.

Conclusion:
Overall by 1927 there was growth in the economy compared with 1921 but the NEP was not pure Communism and it did not provide the basis for the rapid developments that were needed if Russia was to defeat Nazi Germany.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.