VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:42:38 09/17/02 Tue
Author: T
Subject: Re: Iraq?
In reply to: * 's message, "Re: Iraq?" on 11:49:31 09/09/02 Mon

I was going to write a very detailed reply about how what you've written is an incredable crock of shit.

what if the BNP is saying these things to support their harsh policies - not just to cause trouble. you knob.

I disagree; people should be concerned which racial group suffers from racist attacks. Otherwise tackling the problem is made far more dificult. you idiot.

George Bush senior is advising against the war. He doesn't want it. This is well know. Except to you whose opinions are not only idiotic but i believe also lack the knowledge needed to make such bold statements.

I cant remember anyone mentioning a 'pushover' (though i may be wrong) but the point is that if they strike now it would be easier than attacking later when there are more weapons.

For someone so cynical i am surprised that you swallowed that stuff about them dancing on the streets in celebration. That has since been uncovered to have been set up. I heard and read this in both the guardian and on Channel 4 news.


"Finally, if the US was situated mid world and not isolated all the way in the far west, they wouldnt dare wage wars practically every six months. its only cause hussein cant carry out air strikes over the distant america and cannot devastate the country like the US is able to do all over the third world, that they take the matter of war so lightly."

Air strikes!?! HAHAHA do you think Sadam is interested in launching air strikes? not at all. Not practical you small minded fool. They would have no planes left. The planes wouldn't be in the air long enough to launch any missiles. No, the weapons Sadam is interested are far cheaper, effective, terrorising and controversial. Namely biological weapons and poisenous gases primarily. Iraq would be capable of striking America with these, as would smaller groups of people (namely terrorist organisations).

In fact i am thinking that part of the season Sadam is now saying 'come find them, ready or not' MAYBE because these biological weapons etc. have been developed and refined, allowing the sites that developed these things to be disposed of and the weapons stored. Places to synthesise these weapons need not be big at all.

Though overall your thread angered me, in a similar way that it angers me when you see the yobs in racist riots. I put it down to the depressing feeling that idiots like you exist.

though i must admit i liked this bit:


"HYPOCRISY HYPOCRISY, HATE IT. HATE WAR."

very funny. Thank you.

retard.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.