VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:02:48 10/24/01 Wed
Author: tyrone
Subject: Re: the majority of punk is poor
In reply to: tim 's message, "Re: the majority of punk is poor" on 14:33:34 10/23/01 Tue

>Though i think it is important to say, when talking
>about the Living End in this way, i think we must leave >prisnors of society as an anomalie.

You think so?? I dunno, how's this for a chord sequence?
A C D A C F G A D Bflat F E
Not quite your standard punk signature. Also let's not forget that song has a guitar solo that befits one of the greatest ever written (the lengthy ascending run at the end is something that hasn't been done since Jimmy Page) Anyway, that's enough of my wanking over The Living End.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.