To think I thought I covered all preposterous arguments -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wed, October 20 2004, 3:35:06
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: To think I thought I covered all preposterous arguments
In reply to: Margaret 's message, "Re: It was but" on Tue, October 19 2004, 13:30:24

The Streisand midget got so fat that she grew 6 feet tall.

For different periods in his life, also in the seventies, people noticed Fischer's extra-ordinary large feet. Now Fischer confirms himself that he has extra-ordinary large feet.

To proof a negative is always very difficult. There is no way one of you can proof that I did not secretely marry Barbara Streisand. However when my Barbara had straight eyes and a small nose no proof would be necessary. It would be clear to everybody I made up a story. Since Rita's Fischer had a standard footsize it is now, for once and for all, clear she never even met Fischer, let alone marry him.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

To analyse the fantasies is more interesting, don't u think so? -- Katerina, Wed, October 20 2004, 4:39:46
- No -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, October 20 2004, 6:35:16
  - Re: No -- Katerina, Wed, October 20 2004, 7:00:13
    - Re: No -- Peter van der Hoog, Wed, October 20 2004, 9:20:15
      - Ur attitude is the problem. -- Katerina, Wed, October 20 2004, 9:38:27
        My attitude is my attitude -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, October 21 2004, 3:47:47
        According to Eric Bern -- Katerina, Thu, October 21 2004, 5:02:27
        Re: According to Eric Bern -- Peter van der Hoog, Thu, October 21 2004, 7:52:22
        Not the best way to avoid an "unpleasant" question. -- Katerina, Thu, October 21 2004, 9:36:28
        Must be another point I assume -- Margaret, Mon, October 25 2004, 14:40:02
        I don't think so -- Katerina, Tue, October 26 2004, 5:11:28
        Out of sight, out of mind..... -- Margaret, Sun, October 31 2004, 16:14:03
        Didn't u save any messages valuable for u, Rita? (NT) -- Katerina, Mon, November 01 2004, 9:00:48
- Maybe for psychologists, but not for me -- Margaret, Wed, October 20 2004, 13:27:45
  - There're a lot of such ppl among professional writers, by the way (NT) -- Katerina, Thu, October 21 2004, 9:40:58
    - And even more professional wankers(dick inside) -- Todd, Sun, October 24 2004, 10:06:12
      - Poruchick came and vulgarized everything! (NT) -- Katerina, Mon, October 25 2004, 5:12:27