VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, March 28 2005, 8:36:21
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Re: Not an integral
In reply to: Katerina 's message, "Re: Not an integral" on Mon, March 28 2005, 7:52:15

>And returning to the main issue: I still don't see how evolution influences social adaptation
As I said before: read the common sources on social-biology. If those sources don’t convince you that our social behaviour is rooted in the evolution, I for sure will not beable convince you.
>u did not comment my example about children brought up by animals.
Why should I?
>Yes, indeed very strange, and evolution theory also was not taken into consideration as an argument and the laws of dialectics.
To defend genocide, do not take any of these into consideration. However if you want to find out if genocide is part of human nature, then the evolution theory, is your best candidate to find an answer.
>It is a kind of emotional demagogy: making a personal remark instead of refuting the argument.
Just one, against the many personal remarks she made against me.
>Why?
It is my right to refuse to go into a discussion with you about that. It wil be endless and useless.
>From where does it follow?
How do you mean?
>Of course that was ironical.
Then you gave a misleading answer in message http://www.voy.com/122776/1923.html
>Again incorrect analogy: there are many non-anorectic ppl but I dunno anybody who never die.
It looks like you have a misconception of what an analogy is. Anyway, I made my point clear and fortunately one misunderstanding between us is solved: Fla was joking.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.