Re: Mixing up a goat with a sheep. -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon, February 17 2003, 14:04:14
Author: Margaret
Subject: Re: Mixing up a goat with a sheep.
In reply to: Peter van der Hoog 's message, "Mixing up a goat with a sheep." on Sun, February 16 2003, 17:50:43

>I only said it was an animal and then you say I�m
>mixing up a goat with a sheep.

Respectfully disagree. You called it a relationship and then I said that you mixing up a partner
relationship with a break. It is like to mix up a sheep with a wolf.

>Yes and according to the FBI files Hans-Gerhardt
>Fischer wasn't there to support her.

When it is true, Regina was betrayed three times: by her family, by her husband and by Paul
Nemenyi.

You remember Todd
>his nail analogy? Now two reporters of the
>Philadelphia Inquirer also saw the nails, hammered
>into the cross. What do you think, how many people
>have to say they saw the light before Todd is
>convinced?

No idea, but if you�re wanna find something most irrelevant to the story of two Jewish atheists,
that is the cross. Better find an analogy with Marx and Lenin. :-)

>Do you know the exact US immigration laws around 1939
>Me neither but I do know that it wasn�t easy at all to
>enter the USA just before the second world War.
>Especially from Europe.

Havind a close relative in the USA, you can get there without any problems, that is for sure.

>Wow, I�m impressed. For me those foreigners all look
>alike.

Foreigners? Maybe Armenians don't live in Holland, but a lot of them settled in the USA.

>Was that the story Regina told you?

That was the story told to everybody and not only by Regina.

The FBI files tell
>a whole different story.

I wonder why Regina hid it and can�t get the answer.

>But think yourself, Rita: Before Regina left she must
>have taken care for dinner, breakfast etc. Now Regina
>leaves and I have to believe that Fischer after that
>never touches a glass, dish or plate anymore.

You think she walked away, leaving all those dirty dishes for her son? Not nice from her, isn�t it?

For
>breakfast he goes outside, when he gets thirsty he
>goes to a bar, when he wants a snack he goes to a shop
>(and eats the food on the street?). That�s ridiculous
>of course.

Reread Ginzburg article you refere to so often: I get up eleven o'clock maybe. I'll get dressed
and all, look at some chess books, go downstairs and eat. I never cook my own meals. I don't
behave in that stuff. I don't eat in luncheonettes or Automats, either. I like a waiter to wait on
me. Good restaurants.

>He spoke with a lot of acquaintances of Fischer.

And then 'a lot of acquaintances of Fischer' found a lot of inaccuracies and blunt lies in Darrach's
book.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Do you like to eat in a mash? -- Peter van der Hoog, Tue, February 18 2003, 19:11:34
- Re: Do you like to eat in a mash? -- Margaret, Wed, February 19 2003, 13:35:53