Re: How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut! -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, September 11 2003, 10:25:43
Author: Todd
Subject: Re: How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut!
In reply to: Peter van der Hoog 's message, "Re: How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut!" on Thu, September 11 2003, 8:23:40

>No, when somebody says "Better an Orthodox than a
>Jooish discussion" it shows he needs to complicate
>things.

When somebody says such thing he is using True Orthodox terms. Jooz never do that because they don't recognize them.

You only have to know there is good and there
>is bad, Todd. nothing else, live is really very simple.

Yes! To know where is good and where is bad you should study the Holy Akhreduptus and use it in yer life. Otherwise you'll be sent to Hell and Israel.

>To use bad taste in a sarcastic manner is GOOD. To use
>Latin quotes in a serieus way is BAD. You see how
>simple it is, Todd?

Yes, as simple as hell. If you do recognize Latin quotes and find them wit, it means that you lied when called them vulgar.If you don't recognize them and find it vulgar, it means that you are lying now.

>No, it means the information was too fresh for a
>serious journalist to use.

So, you assume that serious journalists use only old news? Who in hell is interested in it?

>>Lance does not have any stories himself, he only
>>doubts the story of Jinky Ong because he does not want
>>it was true. The question is why he does not
>>want the story to be true. Any ideas?
>
>He support Fischer because he likes Fischer's
>anti-semitism. That's what I think.

Who gives a shit about why he supports Fischer. The question was why Lance apparently does not want the story of Jinky Ong to be true. What do you think about it?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

As hard as it is to fight terrorism by invading Iraq -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 3:35:41
- Re:...where the Jooz are -- Todd, Fri, September 12 2003, 9:24:41
  - Re:...where the Jooz are -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 11:22:06
    - Krabbe is very much wrong! -- Todd, Sat, September 13 2003, 1:02:59
  - He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Margaret, Fri, September 12 2003, 13:39:00
    - Re: He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 17:48:36
      - Re: He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Margaret, Tue, September 16 2003, 14:18:13
        Very cool and eloquent dialog! (NT) -- Katerina, Wed, September 17 2003, 1:50:31
        That is true. -- Todd, Fri, September 19 2003, 4:01:26
        Yeah, sure! -- Margaret, Fri, September 19 2003, 13:54:31
    - How can you know? -- Todd aka Chinese spy Sun Khuj v Tsaj Vyn Su Khim Pej Sam, Fri, September 19 2003, 3:59:25
      - Et tu, Porucznik? -- Margaret, Fri, September 19 2003, 14:10:10