Re: How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut! -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Thu, September 11 2003, 8:23:40
Author: Peter van der Hoog
Subject: Re: How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut!
In reply to: Todd 's message, "How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut!" on Thu, September 11 2003, 4:02:18

No, when somebody says "Better an Orthodox than a Jooish discussion" it shows he needs to complicate things. You only have to know there is good and there is bad, Todd. nothing else, live is really very simple.

>So, when you said that Latin quotes were considered as
>vulgar, it was not true and you knew about that.

To use bad taste in a sarcastic manner is GOOD. To use Latin quotes in a serieus way is BAD. You see how simple it is, Todd?

>As Chun did not write anything about Nemenyi in his
>official publication it means that he does not
>consider the information as reliable.

No, it means the information was too fresh for a serious journalist to use.

>Lance does not have any stories himself, he only
>doubts the story of Jinky Ong because he does not want
>it was true. The question is why he does not
>want the story to be true. Any ideas?

He support Fischer because he likes Fischer's anti-semitism. That's what I think.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

U are so deadly serious -- Katerina, Thu, September 11 2003, 9:14:21
- Stop laughing! It is all very serious! -- Todd, Thu, September 11 2003, 10:36:58
Re: How hard it is to swim in hydrochloric acid with yer legs cut! -- Todd, Thu, September 11 2003, 10:25:43
- As hard as it is to fight terrorism by invading Iraq -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 3:35:41
  - Re:...where the Jooz are -- Todd, Fri, September 12 2003, 9:24:41
    - Re:...where the Jooz are -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 11:22:06
      - Krabbe is very much wrong! -- Todd, Sat, September 13 2003, 1:02:59
    - He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Margaret, Fri, September 12 2003, 13:39:00
      - Re: He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Peter van der Hoog, Fri, September 12 2003, 17:48:36
        Re: He would have it every four years....if ever! -- Margaret, Tue, September 16 2003, 14:18:13
        Very cool and eloquent dialog! (NT) -- Katerina, Wed, September 17 2003, 1:50:31
        That is true. -- Todd, Fri, September 19 2003, 4:01:26
        Yeah, sure! -- Margaret, Fri, September 19 2003, 13:54:31
      - How can you know? -- Todd aka Chinese spy Sun Khuj v Tsaj Vyn Su Khim Pej Sam, Fri, September 19 2003, 3:59:25
        Et tu, Porucznik? -- Margaret, Fri, September 19 2003, 14:10:10