Now it will be interesting -- Flambers Drugstore

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sat, March 15 2003, 7:05:39
Author: Todd
Subject:

Now it will be interesting
In reply to: Peter van der Hoog 's message, "Sorry, not my cup of tea, Todd" on Fri, March 14 2003, 18:07:48

I called you beat the Jooz and not have tea! But now the things changed. The Main Joo got his ass kicked and ran away in horror and the other Joo is trying to refute the article of Peter Nicholas(in his Jooish way though, because he is a Joo). Look

From: Edward David (chessnut804@yahoo.com)
Subject: Re: HAVING LISTENING TO NOT EVEN HALF OF BOBBY FISCHERS INTERVIEWS......
View: Complete Thread (103 articles)
Original Format
Newsgroups: rec.games.chess.analysis, rec.games.chess.computer, rec.games.chess.misc, rec.games.chess.play-by-email, rec.games.chess.politics
Date: 2003-03-14 15:15:45 PST

flambers@altavista.net (Todd E. Flambers) wrote in message news:...
>>Where have you been three weeks ago when the second article about
Fischer's father was published? Read this thread with the new article
and new details:<<

It's similar article as the ones that came out in November.

>>Yes, it is controversial, but how can you refute the information
from
it? FBI files and the letter's from Nemenyi's archives are pure facts.
Can you refute them?<<

Yes, you said it, it's very controversial. The answer is very simple
though, there's nothing to refute from the FBI files because they
(FBI) never mentioned that Nemenyi is the father. There's is only one
document to refute and that is the Birth Certificate. It says Gerhardt
Fischer is the father. Can anyone refute that?

I answered him in a new, Joo-free thread, but my answer did not appear yet.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]