Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2 ] |
| Subject: Re: It's nice to hear Booms on the radio again,,but | |
|
Author: paul |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 19:31:00 11/20/07 Tue In reply to: DeaconMike 's message, "It's nice to hear Booms on the radio again,,but" on 16:57:23 11/20/07 Tue i haven't been able to listen because the streaming link on the web site doesn't work. however, i agree that there has to be some sort of friction, symmetry or variety of personalities within any talk show featuring more than one host. kwto is a "news talk" station, so it's not surprising to learn booms has limited time and average colleagues. not sure if you saw my most recent thread, deacon, but dad is back in the unemployment line (at least as far as a full-time job). i'm still holding out hope that dad and booms will get another show. sporting news radio - for whom they did a couple trial runs a few years ago - doesn't appear to have anything on the air from 4-7 pm (they're currently replaying tim brando every day during that slot). snr should seriously look into signing them. >after listening on and off for a week >i'm not as excited to turn the radio on >each morning. I know the show generates >revenue from advertising but Booms' new >show runs more advertising than an infomercial >at 3am. To me it seems like you hear Chucky >ranting for 5 minutes, 1 caller that's 80 >years old then 15 minutes of news and commercials. > >The people/host he has working with him sounds >more like my grandpa Bill and there's not much >bickering between them, like the Kiley and Booms >show. But maybe that's what i miss and what i >was expecting, but it's not going to happen >on this gig anytime soon that i see. > >Heck, i could do a better job co-hosting the show. >Least we'd get some banter between a democrat and >a republican. But maybe with some more time the show >will get better and more energetic. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |