VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3] ]
Subject: Re: Daniel Radcliffe might not..........


Author:
Daf
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:57:17 11/20/03 Thu
In reply to: Lisa 's message, "Re: Daniel Radcliffe might not.........." on 13:48:07 05/31/03 Sat

Well, the character in the books ages 1 year each time around, just like the movies will do, POA in 2004 and GOF in 2005. So by the 7th book, Harry will be 17, and Daniel should be able to pull off the part ACORDING TO THE BOOK perfectly. He'll probably stay, hopefully so.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.