VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Mon 04/28/03 - 1:05:42 AM
Author: CAwasinNJ
Subject: Re: KALL 910 moving to 700
In reply to: Curious 's message, "Re: KALL 910 moving to 700" on Mon 04/28/03 - 12:11:37 AM

>Why did CC claim in Arave's column that 910 has poor
>sound? Seems like they should have been able to take a
>case concerning that to the FCC (for a power increase
>or actions against conflicting signals, etc)?

What makes one signal more important than another? If Merc^H^H^H^H Clear Channel could have increased power, I'm sure they would have. More listeners = more money.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Forum timezone: GMT-7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.