VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:04:51 02/07/06 Tue
Author: The Rhino
Subject: He was really good
In reply to: Silk 's message, "Was Clooney really that good?" on 22:31:31 02/06/06 Mon

It was a different type of role for him. There was no "Clooney" to his character at all. In fact the character was brooding and paranoid which is the complete opposite of the confident character he normally plays. I think you would have appreciated the role.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

  • My theory is that if a good looking actor/actress uglies themself up or gains a lot of weight for a role... they get an Oscar nomination (NT) -- Rocket, 09:05:16 02/07/06 Tue

    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.