VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]
Subject: Re:司 馬 成


Author:
反戰人
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 07:39:18 02/19/03 Wed
In reply to: 反戰人 's message, "心酸!!!!!!" on 08:42:03 02/16/03 Sun
 大家說的是2003年應否打仗, 而不是1991年的那次. 91年發起戰爭的確是伊拉克, 但這次呢? '司馬超之心, 路人皆見'

而司馬兄的 '慕尼黑反戰的教訓', 正如７A中史人說的一樣, '看似有理'. 讓我告訴你, 我還在讀西史; 又不暪你說, 我正在讀二次大戰的歷史. 如果我上課沒有留心的話, 我可能還會相信你的論點. 但的老師和課本都告訴我, 英法綏靖政策的主要原因是經濟問題. 司馬兄的論點只是 part of the true.

且 '心酸!!!!!!' 一文主旨是諷刺人, 諷刺那些只顧一己私利的人, 而不是說美國的不是(當然也有). 所以望司馬兄不要也不需為美國撐腰.
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.