| Subject: Re: Summer's bad logic |
Author:
Perhaps
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 06:33:24 06/11/03 Wed
In reply to:
Summer
's message, "One more bad point of the "teacher"" on 01:50:20 06/11/03 Wed
Summer said: 'The "teacher" said 懂得包容是一種德行, but it dependson what kind of questions you are talking about. To
包容 robbery, rape, murder...... is not a good manner.Hong Kong people are very 包容, so we have a lot of rubbish and saliva on the street. We should learn to become less 包容 now.' Summer has committed the error of adding extra meaning to a concept and attack the straw man.
Summer said, 'And the teacher further give a reason
that況且很多時候理虧的在於自己. I don't know if this
is his/her experience. But how can you prove the one
who does not 包容 is 很多時候理虧?'
Summer has committed the error of distorting the meaning of the "teacher", because the "teacher" just said of '很多時', not '時時'. Besides, Summer has extensively abused the word "prove". Look up the exact meaning of "prove" in 李天命's books, Mr Summer, before u use the word next time.
Summer said, "Mr. Choi Chun Ho argued very long with others about the F7 dinner, you can say he is not包容, but he has
very good reason. He is not 理虧. I fully support him." Here, Summer failed to explain why Choi was reasonable. Neither did he prove why his support to Choi is reasonable. So, his support is groundless, or nonsensical, or emotional.
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|
Feedback: 