VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]678910 ]
Subject: Let's us look at your 惡意 again


Author:
Summer
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:57:28 04/28/03 Mon
In reply to: 人一個 's message, "今次真係冇惡意........" on 15:27:45 04/28/03 Mon

Let's appreciate again how 人一個 say his view on Single-eye Dragon:
睇完你o既留言之後,一個字形容我o既感覺,嘔!
睇完你o既留言之後,一個字形容我對你o既感覺,狗!
睇完你o既留言之後,一個字形容我對你o既忠告,走!
Can this kind of message made by a "normal and sensible" person? It contains no point at all. According to your criteria, what should be erased in this website is exactly this kind of message.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> Subject: Please reply with a suitable message, thank you!


Author:
人一個
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:49:32 04/29/03 Tue

I want to ask a question, is your reply suitable? Is it realated to my message?
According to your view, I think the webmaster should add one more rule, that is, 'all messages without points should not be allowed here. '
But how to identify a message here has point or not? I think Summer can help us, since he has excellent logic. And the most important is, his judgement always right, he has never been wrong.
[> [> [> [> Subject: Your two mistakes


Author:
Summer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:09:32 04/30/03 Wed

Sorry, you made a mistake. Please read my previous messages: I never said messages without points should be erased. Please give proof if you want to accuse me.
Secondly, you made a mistake again. I said: "According to your criteria, what should be erased in this website is exactly this kind of message." because it is you who say that attitude is important, not me.
Please be rational, please.
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: My two so-called mistakes


Author:
人一個
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:05:31 05/01/03 Thu

For the so-called first mistake, I just said that 'according to your view', but not 'as you said'.
Do you know what I mean? Let me make it more clear. I used 'according to your view' because the idea, 'messages without points should not be allowed here' should be made as a rule, is come from what you have said before. Of couse, this is my own idea, and you have never said it before.
For the so-called second mistake, I am not very sure what you mean. If you do not mind, would you please explain to me? Or you can just forget it.

And I want to add one more thing, but it is just my feeling, you can simply neglect it if you do not want to accept it.
I think you can try to reply on others' messages only, without adding some offensive words such as 'you made mistakes', 'you have no points', 'you are illogical', 'please be rational'. I and somebody else feel those words are uncomfotable.
[> [> [> Subject: summer的留言犯了人身攻擊的謬誤


Author:
7b7
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:14:55 04/29/03 Tue

"5. 人身攻擊謬誤(Argument against the person, Argumentum ad Hominem)

在辯論我們不是依理來攻擊別人的論証,而是轉而攻擊論者本身。這樣就是犯了人身攻擊謬誤。這類謬誤可分為兩種:

a.略去


b. Argumentum ad Hominem (circumstantial)

另一種人身攻擊的謬誤的著眼點是將某人的觀點或論証與其所處的環境及職位關聯起來,利用其所處之位來否定其言論。例子:在一次有關“狩獵是否道德”的爭論中,一個獵人被對手指責是殘害無辜動物的屠夫,獵人大怒,反唇相譏,說:「你憑什麼批評我,你不是天天在食無辜的牛豬的肉嗎?」"

from <思考與理性思考>p.91-120 by 葉保強、余錦波

如有興趣,可參考這個嶺南大學哲學系的網頁.http://www.ln.edu.hk/philoso/critical.11.htm


summer犯了的正是 Argumentum ad Hominem (circumstantial),他不是針對"人一個"留言的內容作出評論,相反他是以"人一個"先前的言論來判斷"人一個"的論點的真偽,這正正犯了人身攻擊的謬誤.
[> [> [> [> Subject: ???? and recommendation


Author:
Summer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:18:17 04/30/03 Wed

Point out 人一個's message only scolds and has no point = 人身攻擊 ???????


<思考與理性思考>p.91-120 by 葉保強、余錦波 is a bad book of philosophy as pointed out by 李天命 who is the most famous philosopher in HK. If anyone want to find a better book, please read those written by 李天命.
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re:有關李天命博士對"思考與理性思考"一書的批評


Author:
Russell Fung
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:24:09 05/01/03 Thu

李博士在一九九四年四月號的明報週刊中發表了題為"特異思維研究報告"之文章﹐對葉保強博士和余錦波先生合著之"思考與理性思考"一書作過批評。
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re:Thank you very much Mr. Russell Fung


Author:
Summer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:26:11 05/01/03 Thu

Thanks for providing me this piece of information.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: 應是明報月刊,不是明報週刊。


Author:
如題
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 05:55:47 05/02/03 Fri

如題
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: 謝謝


Author:
Russell Fung
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:01:24 05/02/03 Fri

>如題
[> [> [> Subject: 純感覺 !


Author:
肥魚
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:35:50 05/02/03 Fri

我覺得 Summer d 回覆似細路吵架
所以, 我覺得Summer 很有趣 、很可愛
我很喜歡看 Summer 的留言

由於這只是個人感覺 , 所以我費事打 reasons and examples.
所以本留言表面上是無 point .
不過 , 我相信 , 和我有同感者, 「大有人在」

如果你唔喜歡 Summer ga wa , 你可以暫時將個人榮辱放低 , 以外人的心態看 Summer, 你會發現 Summer 好可愛
再唔係等你成熟 d 再回顧 , 可能有一個會心微笑 !


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.