VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]
Subject: Hubble discoveries back anti-gravity theory


Author:
Betty
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 09:20:44 02/21/04 Sat
In reply to: Betty 's message, "Hubbble telescope to die & be destoyed" on 12:26:05 02/15/04 Sun

Imagine... The discovery of anti-gravity & learning how it works! Planes without engines. Buildings or cities in the clouds. Revolutionary, fast, cheap, space travel. All that & more may be possible someday due to the science & discoveries of the Hubble Space Telescope that boosh wants to pull the plug on. Screw dust balls like Mars & the Moon, this kind of stuff is much more important!

MARINA DEL REY -- A dark, unseen energy permeating space is pushing the universe apart just as Einstein predicted it could in 1917, according to striking new measurements of distant exploding stars by the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope.

The energy, whose source remains unknown, was named the cosmological constant by Einstein. In a prediction he later called "my greatest blunder," but which received its most stringent test ever with the new measurements, Einstein posited a kind of antigravity force pushing galaxies apart with a strength that did not change over billions of years of cosmic history.

Theorists seeking to explain the mysterious force have suggested that it could, in fact, become stronger or weaker over time -- either finally tearing the universe apart in a violent event called "the big rip" or shutting down in the distant future. If the force somehow shut down, gravity would again predominate in the cosmos and the universe would collapse on itself. That version of oblivion is sometimes called "the big crunch."

The new observations, led by Dr. Adam Riess at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, made the tightest measurements ever on the strength of the antigravity force over time. The observations relied on Hubble observations of the exploding stars, or supernovas, which are swept up in the dark energy's cosmic push.

But rather than seeing the changes in the push that many theorists had predicted, Einstein's steady, unchanging cosmological constant fits the data better than any alternatives.

"What we've found is that it looks like a semi-permanent kind of dark energy," Riess said Friday. "It appears like it's been with us for a long time; if it is changing, it's doing so slowly."

"Einstein's theory," Riess added, "is looking a lot better than before this data."

While the new results favor Einstein's nearly century-old prediction, they do not yet entirely rule out the stranger and more changeable forms of energy that some theorists have put forth. In particular, scientific proponents of the big rip, in which the energy would eventually become so powerful that it tears apart planets, stars and even atoms, have been left with some hope. But the data suggest, Riess said, that any ultimate cataclysm could not occur until well into the distant future, perhaps 30 billion years from now.

The measurements raise new questions about NASA's decision, now being reviewed, to let the Hubble Space Telescope die a slow death in space during the next several years rather than attempt another servicing mission with the space shuttle. NASA's administrator, Sean O'Keefe, has said that a servicing mission would be too risky in the wake of the disaster involving the space shuttle Columbia.

Riess said he disagreed with the decision to shut down the Hubble.

"The Hubble is an invaluable tool in the studies," he said. "Nothing else can contribute this kind of data. I think to stop doing this science with Hubble would be a very unfortunate choice."

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Hubble & Keck look back 13 billion yearsBetty09:47:40 02/21/04 Sat
    Hubble near dawn of creationBetty08:32:46 03/10/04 Wed


    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.