VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]
Subject: NASA studies robot servicing of Hubble


Author:
Betty
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10:20:22 04/14/04 Wed
In reply to: Betty 's message, "Hubbble telescope to die & be destoyed" on 12:26:05 02/15/04 Sun

NASA studies robot servicing of Hubble
By Leonard David, SPACE.com

NASA is reviewing over two dozen proposals to extend the useful scientific life of the Hubble Space Telescope, as well as safely dispose of the Earth orbiting observatory at the end of its life in space.

There is growing support for robotic servicing of the Hubble — but whether or not augmenting the telescope with new astronomical gear utilizing robot hardware is possible remains debatable.

NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland is now reviewing ideas from a variety of groups, including university and major aerospace firms. According to SPACE.com sources, Goddard has received 27 proposals ranging from a few pages to one tome of 200 pages length from a leading aerospace firm.

The proposals are in response to a Goddard "Request for Information" on Hubble Space Telescope End of Mission Alternatives in February, with the NASA center receiving the proposals March 22. At present, a review of submitted ideas and discussions with proposal groups is actively underway.

NASA spokesman, Don Savage, told SPACE.com that the request resulted in ideas from mostly industry, but did include views from other government agencies, academia, as well as a private citizen. Savage said that the ideas are now being evaluated.

However, while the submittals are now being reviewed, any go-ahead on a robotic servicing scheme for Hubble is far from assured.

Robot ties to Moon, Mars and beyond

At the core of extending Hubble operations is just how robust methods and technologies are at this point to carry out a robotic servicing mission. Such firms as Lockheed Martin and Ball Aerospace are among teams scoping out how best to extend the life of Hubble.

According to one aerospace executive source, the robotic servicing of Hubble fits in well with NASA's Moon, Mars, and beyond plans — in terms of pushing forward wider use and adoption of robots for beyond Earth orbit exploration purposes.

At Goddard, an internal panel of experts is assessing the feasibility of telerobotically changing out Hubble astronomical instruments. Also, an attachable package of batteries and gyroscopes that can be mounted on Hubble, done via robotic servicing, is being considered.

Lightning rod decisions

The look at how best to extend Hubble's useful scientific life has been spurred by a NASA decision to cancel a June 2006 servicing mission by astronauts to the space-based telescope. Furthermore, the observatory's retrieval by a space shuttle at the end of its mission is no longer an option, according to the space agency.

In making those judgments, NASA Administrator, Sean O'Keefe, has become a lightning rod for both political and public criticism. NASA policy requires the safe disposal of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). As the eye on the Universe whirls about Earth, it is now headed for an uncontrolled reentry into Earth's atmosphere no earlier than the year 2013.

At present, Hubble's projected battery life is the principal limiting factor for overall observatory lifetime. It is expected that HST will not be totally stationary in inertial space at the end of its life in orbit.

Dump or boost?

NASA's plan is to maximize HST's scientific productivity through the remainder of the mission by extending its useful productive lifetime and sustaining its unique scientific capabilities as long as possible.

Once the HST science program is no longer viable, the plan is to either dump the facility in a controlled manner into the ocean or boost the observatory to a safe parking orbit — over 1,550 miles ((2,500 kilometers) altitude above Earth. To do so requires use of a still-to-be-built and checked out propulsion module that would be attached to Hubble.

In this scenario, the propulsion stage would be lofted on an expendable launch vehicle. It would then rendezvous, capture, and dock with the HST. Once those actions are complete, the telescope can be nudged into a controlled reentry or boosted to the higher safe parking orbit.

According to a Goddard document, there may be advantages to performing the deorbit or orbit boost immediately after the completion of science operations, which could be as early as 2007 or 2008.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Don't let the Hubble diea premature deathBetty10:32:50 04/14/04 Wed


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.