VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Sunday, January 29, 03:27:08am
Author: JayBee
Subject: Carrying on a bit more (r)
In reply to: Swatkat 's message, "Re: Well, I dunno (r)" on Saturday, January 28, 10:47:43am

And it's also not merely 'being moral', although it's certainly another important part of it.

I guess what I was responding to was the statement in your original post, where you said that:

In an ideal world, the Hero is someone who does the Right Things for the Right Reason.

I thought you were supplying a definition of heroism there -- in essence saying that "heroism" = "doing the Right Things for the Right Reason," which to me sounds pretty much like a definition of morality or an ethical code as opposed to heroism. If, for example, I am polite to my neighbors because I believe in a civil society, that's "doing the right thing for the right reason," but I would say that is by no means heroic.

You're right to distinguish the mythological/literary/archetypical "hero" from the idea of real-life heroism, though, and I think that's why we went in different directions: you were discussing the former, and I the latter.

To be honest, the hero archetype doesn't interest me, precisely because I don't see it as relevant in real life. What you describe as your reaction to Jack in Lost is my reaction to almost *all* such "hero" characters in fiction: I don't buy the premise of the archetype, and therefore the characters annoy the hell out of me.

Michael doesn't believe in a Hero.

I never thought I'd ever say this, but I'm with Michael! Or perhaps to put a different spin on it -- the only heroes I believe in are tragic (that is, examples of the fact that trying to live up to the archetype is doomed to failure).

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.