The Terminological Inexactitudes of Donald -- Spotlight Ministries Debate Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: The Terminological Inexactitudes of Donald

Author:
Bunsen

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:16:37 07/10/04 Sat
In reply to: E 's message, "Re: Nuther thing" on 09:38:47 07/03/04 Sat

It seems to me that Donald is using the old Watchtower "thoecratic strategy" or "terminological inexactitudes" of denying they ever said such a thing or that everyone else got the wrong idea.

Just as they did after the dates for Armageddon in 1914, 1925, 1942 and 1975.

Seems that Donald is using the same double standards.
Saying he was trying to appease those on the Reachout by agreeing that the 144,000 was NOT literal.
Please when has a JW ever tried to appease another persons view. Why this time Donald you didn't any other time over other JW doctrines, but you choose this major WT doctrine to do so.

Then he says "I believe the number is literal, but that it would not matter if it wasn't"

Is this doublespeak or what!!

He believes its literal, but it wouldn't matter if it wasn't. In other words he is not in total agreement with the WT over the teaching.

Shows great confidence in the WT teaching then.

I'm afraid that Donald has given a prime example of someone controlled by the Watchtower.

When he expresses an opinion oppossed to the WT teaching, he suddenly feels he has to backtrack and apologise to his Watchtower God for daring to doubt what they said.
I mean we can't have "independant thinking" in the organisation now can we, someone might learn the truth.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]