Re: Good article on histories of Kerry and Bush. -- robdogdotcom

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: Good article on histories of Kerry and Bush.

Author:
RobDogBastard

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:51:30 02/19/04 Thu
In reply to: Ray 's message, "Re: Good article on histories of Kerry and Bush." on 22:37:47 02/18/04 Wed

Kerry has balls? If that's the case why have his opinions on important platform issues changed so often according to their political impact? Doesn't sound too "ballsy." How about is inability to tackle certain issues at all: i.e. abortion and gay rights. Just because he went to war doesn't make him a good guy - I can point out numerous examples of people who went to the very same war and were the biggest pieces of shit I've ever known.

The problem with liberals is that they are only willing to scratch the surface of an issue before passing judgement. 'Kerry went to war so he is brave.' Bullshit. Kerry went to war so he is like hundred of thousands of other Americans - some of whom went because they were scared not because they were brave. Look into the reality of the situation and you can quickly see that Kerry is a priviledged upper-crust brat who felt the pressures of his Harvard classmates and decided to follow their lead and go to Vietnam.

The biggest problem that everybody - right, left middle, or otherwise - should have with John Kerry is that he is a worthless political figurehead who stands for nothing. The democrats don't want a leader, they want somebody who can beat Geroge W. Bush in the election - that's a pretty sorry goal when you think about it. "Anybody But Bush" has become the mantra of leftist zombie morons who refuse to think for themselves and want the government to buy them all security blankets for Christman 2004. And from the look of things they went ahead and chose "anybody." The man who says the war was bad even though he voted for it, the man who says the economic policies of th Bush white house were bad even though he voted for them, who says that the Patriot Act was wrong even though he voted for it, who says he is pro-choice but refuses to make a statement regarding the issue, says he supports civil rights but specifically does not allow for gay marriage, and the list goes on people - maybe one day people will investigate their candidates prior to supporting them.

PITME!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Good article on histories of Kerry and Bush.	Ray	22:07:30 02/19/04 Thu
Re: Good article on histories of Kerry and Bush. -- Uncle Jimmy, 09:12:40 02/23/04 Mon