VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:15:37 05/12/03 Mon
Author: Kilus
Author Host/IP: dialup-23.192.220.203.acc01-lord-gla.comindico.com.au / 203.220.192.23
Subject: Re: by the way who is the sick fuck posting the picture of himself fucking his own ass??????
In reply to: wibbly pig 's message, "Re: by the way who is the sick fuck posting the picture of himself fucking his own ass??????" on 06:51:51 05/12/03 Mon

I don't want to be rude or disrespectful, and I honestly don't want to start an argument, but it is a grave injustice for Princess Wibbly Pig to slander those who are most systematically undervalued, underpaid, underemployed, underfinanced, underinsured, underrated, and otherwise underserved and undermined as undeserving and underclass. Before I begin, let me point out that as long as the beer keeps flowing and the paychecks keep coming, his worshippers don't really care that he dreams of a time when he'll be free to use scapegoating as a foil to draw anger away from more accurate targets. That's the way he's planned it, and that's the way it'll happen -- not may happen, but will happen -- if we don't interfere, if we don't turn random, senseless violence into meaningful action. The human community has had the same basic problem with neocolonialism all along, ever since the second human being walked erect. Then again, that notion has been popular for as long as terrorism has existed. Although Wibbly Pig is only one turd floating in the moral cesspool that our society has become, I welcome his comments. However, he needs to realize that this is not wild speculation. This is not a conspiracy theory. This is documented fact. To the best of my knowledge, when he says that no one is smart enough to see through his transparent lies, in his mind, that's supposed to end the argument. It's like he believes he has said something very profound.

In a manner of speaking, my purpose here is not to reinvigorate our collective commitment to building and maintaining a sensitive, tolerant, and humane community. Well, okay, it is. But I should point out that I like to speak of Wibbly Pig as "lecherous". That's a reasonable term to use, I contend, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, if you want to hide something from him, you just have to put it in a book. Wibbly Pig maintains that the ideas of "freedom" and "antipluralism" are Siamese twins. Perhaps it would be best for him to awaken from his delusional narcoleptic fantasyland and observe that statements like, "He is proposing a cure for which there is no disease or, more likely, a disease for which there is no cure" accurately express the feelings of most of us here. If there's an untold story here, it's that he wants to get me thrown in jail. He can't cite a specific statute that I've violated, but he does believe that there must be some statute. This tells me that I, for one, am annoyed by the self-righteous and sometimes jaundiced manifestations of rebelliousness against an inherited civilization of which Wibbly Pig's cohorts do not have the slightest understanding. Am I being too harsh for writing that? Maybe I am, but that's really the only way you can push a point through to Wibbly Pig. Should we be concerned that Wibbly Pig wants to discredit legitimate voices in the clericalism debate? I'll answer that question for you: Yes, we should sincerely be concerned, because if he had done his homework, he'd know that I feel no more personal hatred for him than I might feel for a herd of wild animals or a cluster of poisonous reptiles. One does not hate those whose souls can exude no spiritual warmth; one pities them. His understrappers are just as bad as he is, if not worse. Let me rephrase that: If my memory serves me correctly, I am aware that many people may object to the severity of my language. But is there no cause for severity? Naturally, I suspect that there is, because he uses the very intellectual tools he criticizes, namely consequentialist arguments rather than arguments about truth or falsity.

As peremptory as Wibbly Pig's magic-bullet explanations are, Wibbly Pig's argument that he never engages in sex-crazed, bloodthirsty, or lascivious politics is hopelessly flawed and totally circuitous. Is this anything other than naive animalism? The answer is obvious if you happen to notice that it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about Wibbly Pig and about hypothetical solutions to our Wibbly Pig problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that the problem with him is not that he's silly. It's that he wants to beat plowshares into swords. For your information, he should have been removed from the gene pool before he had a chance to contaminate it. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that his analects have served as a powerful weapon with which insincere, hypocritical urban guerrillas can paralyze any serious or firm decision and thereby become responsible for the weak and half-hearted execution of even the most necessary measures. Wibbly Pig will almost certainly tiptoe around that glaringly evident fact, because if he didn't, you might come to realize that he is out of control and must be stopped. Let me try to explain what I mean by that in a single sentence: He has two imperatives. The first is to dismantle the family unit. The second imperative is to tear down all theoretical frameworks for addressing the issue. Now that this post has come to an end, I undeniably hope you walk away from it realizing that I invite you to talk to Princess Wibbly Pig yourself if you feel that I'm misrepresenting his position.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.