VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]678 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:06:14 04/16/03 Wed
Author: Hagbard
Author Host/IP: accel22.nyc.untd.com / 64.136.27.32
Subject: Re: Which one did you get the 157 on?
In reply to: Khronos 's message, "Which one did you get the 157 on?" on 06:20:06 04/15/03 Tue

>The first one KSM mentioned or the second? The first
>one is a joke, the second one seemed to me to be a bit
>more legit. More like I remember a real IQ test
>being. The second one also printed up these
>comparrison charts and the numbers seemed to match
>there for me too (hince me giving out my SAT score).
>

The first one. And agreed that it's a joke. I haven't looked at the second one, but if I get around to it sometime I might. It would be interesting to see what it scores me as.

>770 math! Whooeee! That's damn near perfect.

It's one question wrong. Interestingly enough, one wrong could also give you a 780 because of the fucked up way the SAT is scored. And this was off the same SAT scale that you took yours on.

About two or three years later they adjusted the median to be exactly 400 on each part (where before it was like 360 or something). So now everyone scores just a bit higher.

>I
>never was a math whiz, so I didn't expect much there.
>I can do good in math clases, but it's a real pain.
>I've thought off and on about getting a degree in
>computer science, but all the math pretty much
>discouraged me.

Actually, there isn't that much math in computer science. Sure you have to take a year of calculus and course on linear algebra (i.e. matrices) but that's about it.

>Not that I couldn't do it, but that
>with my family and all finding the time to do the
>homework would be tough. That's the good thing about
>a business degree (even the MBA). It's not all that
>hard cognative wise.
>

I can understand the time thing. I'm working 10 hours a week overtime right now (paid, fortunately), and having no family, I still feel like I lose a lot of free time.

>With that math score you picked the right field to
>pursue. Of course getting into a school like
>Northwestern and their engineering department is an
>accomplishment all it's own. Good job.
>
>Fuckin' Brainiac!

Thank you.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.