VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:24:33 04/20/03 Sun
Author: Hagbard
Author Host/IP: accel22.lax.untd.com / 64.136.26.32
Subject: Re: but it something ludicrous like $300 million
In reply to: Gwydion 's message, "Re: but that fucking boat look real!" on 11:47:40 04/17/03 Thu

Umm...no. That something ludicrous like $300 million was the cost for the [i]whole[/i] picture. It was budgeted for considerably less than that. Cameron went way over budget on the picture, making it the most expensive movie ever up to that point (and may still hold the record). Titanic broke the previous record held by Terminator 2 ($200 million) which is another Cameron flick.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.