VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:52:04 04/07/03 Mon
Author: eom
Author Host/IP: 216-80-74-68.d.enteract.com / 216.80.74.68
Subject: Re: Who should the U.S. attack next in the war on terrorism
In reply to: DammitBoy! 's message, "Who should the U.S. attack next in the war on terrorism" on 21:38:08 04/07/03 Mon

I don't see why we can't handle iran and syria at the same time.
this will help w/all the microwave generation bitches crying about the extreme length of the war.
as you know, when you finally take out one opponenet, you get all his cards, which will allow you to cash in for a bunch of reinforcement troops, and snowball over the rest of your enemies.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.