| Subject: Why I should be President is |
Author:
Bob Schell
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 09:12:25 01/26/08 Sat
basically simple, I have more workable solution then do the candidates running for president from both political parties.
Hi! now that I have your attention I have one very interesting question to ask you, would you vote for me if I could get you and 10’s of thousands of your fellow students, after graduation and earning a living-job, to “VOLUNTEER”, yes “VOLUNTEER” to help pay for some of the rebuilding of America’s decaying infrastructures, etc., if I can logically prove to you, when all is said and done, it did not cost you “ONE RED CENT” (not a new type tax idea) to help do? In less than a week under the heading “TURTLE TWO” I will post the answer to the question by giving you one in-depth very prime example of a “particular group of people” I believe will “ENTHUSIASTICALLY”; yes “ENTHUSIASTICALLY” voluntarily participate in my said solution. In fact, this one “particular group of people” alone has the potential to raise ten’s of millions of dollars (conservative estimate) year after year to help pay for the rebuilding of America’s decaying infrastructures. As a matter of fact, some very wealthy people, particularly Hollywood celebrity types, may want to spend extra money to so-call “personalize” the said idea. I plan to participate in this solution, but understandably not this particular format, because I do not fit the narrow criteria.
If you did read about my S.S .TURTLE privatization account solution on the message board, what was your initial impression, did you like what you read and hopefully listened to on YouTube or not? Do you need to learn more about my S.S. “TURTLE” privatization account solution, before you will support it? Do you think it is logically possible by the time you do retire you would have earned a million dollars or more under my S.S .TURTLE privatization account savings (LOCK BOX) agenda, to spend after you retire? Remember, no matter what amount of money you make, you still will get your “full retirement benefit” you are entitled to from S.S. when you retire, under my “TURTLE” privatization account formula. Bear in mind, by supporting the Democratic S.S. agenda you will “deprive yourself”, I emphasize, “DEPRIVE YOURSELF” of the “POSSIBILITY” to make those extra dollars, let alone a conceivable million dollars or more. My point, if having an extra million dollars or more to spend after you retire doesn’t get you excited, my guess is, nothing will. If excitedly yes! "S.S. TURTLE" says, "CLIMB ON MY STRONG BACK", hold on tight "RIDE ME" until you either "RETIRE" to a better "FINANCIAL SECURITY" or until "DEATH" doth do us "PART". That can only take place if you and others, who like my solution, help me to get our politicians in Washington to do it. Incidentally, I did let the 4 remaining Democratic presidential hopefuls know about my S.S. “TURTLE” privatization account solution and my “David” vs. Goliath debate challenge. By the way, if you would like that to take place, then just start spreading the word about you know what. I doubt I will hear back from anyone of them. Anyway, I remind you one final time, it is you’re retirement livelihood they are saying no to. Something to think about, with so many good paying jobs being outsourced to other countries; don’t you think it is prudently wise to make sure you make enough money now by using your own S. S. taxes to do it by, for your retirement years, so that you can enjoy your retirement? To those who have no clue what this is about, please look up on YouTube the following, Social Security plan for a better understanding of how my “TURTLE” agenda will work safely for you.
My unusual speaker money back guarantees.
What is it about, very simple, how much I will get paid or not get paid if I were invited to speak at your higher learning institution. In other words, if a majority (80%) of the student audience liked my S.S. “TURTLE” privatization agenda and my volunteer agenda I get paid what I asked for. If less students like either solution (under 80%) I just get my out of pocket expenses paid for. That should tell you how much confidence I have in both solutions. In fact, have you ever had another public speaker, politician, etc., offer to do likewise, I bet you never have nor ever will. By the way, any other solutions (I have two or three others I can speak about including my own new in-depth solution for Iraq) will be excluded from the offer. I will leave it up to you to find out what my reasonable speaking fee is if interested. Incidentally, my offer is limited in duration, so I suggest you act quickly if you are interested in having me speak at your higher learning entity.
In closing, if you have some spare time and what to learn a little more about the person who sent you this, please look up my webpage at, imatired.org and click on art. Just prior to my retirement I mentioned to a number of my co-workers that I was going to create my own unique style of visual art. At the time I had no clue what it would be, I just knew I would do it. Anyway, you can see two of nine I have finished. By the way, I never took one art lesson in my entire life so please judge my art accordingly. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Bob Schell
P. S. to save time I will post the answer on the following University message boards. University of N. Carolina =The Seahawk,
Missouri Kansas City (UMKC) University News and Western Carolina =Western Carolinian. It would also help tremendously if you could spread what you just read out over the internet, that is if you liked what you read and what others to know too. Thanks.
My Presidential Motto
I’m not GOD (or a LAWYER)
I only have a few GOOD SOLUTIONS
However, enough to make a REAL POSITIVE DIFFERENCE in AMERICA’S FUTURE.
P. S. The only way for your friends and others to read this, is for you to suggest they read it, it is that important to their future too.
“Political Rhetoric Boloneyism”
What does it mean?
My answer, it is the art of political confusion, fictionalized hyperbole, brainwashing, negative propaganda, double-talk, malarkey, hogwash, bloviation, absurdity, twaddle and hot-air. That is, political offerings from professional politicians of solutions to important issues that will not become a reality (unrealistic expectations) if elected to office, but are just articulated consumption words that are put forth during political campaigns to get our vote. That is my cynical opinion on politics in general and presidential politics in particular, in America right now. Last, but not least, in my opinion, this is why so many of America’s voters are turned off and may not vote in the upcoming 2008 Presidential elections. Do you agree to what I just wrote?
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|
Feedback: 