VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:58:21 08/15/05 Mon
Author: Eurydice
Author Host/IP: 151.203.52.118
Subject: Well, I don't know
In reply to: Ramses 2 's message, "I'm not sure I buy all the various spin off talk" on 21:12:38 08/15/05 Mon

I do think there was some occasional drifting away from All About Buffy. Characters like Wood and Andrew and Kennedy (just to name a couple) got that extra little bit of attention which raises suspicion. Sort of like when the camera does a closeup on some random knick-knack and you just know it'll turn out to be the murder weapon. The same is true of certain threads and ideas - too much attention leads to expectation.

And I don't think that wondering about FE's effectiveness is missing the point. Over the years we've seen that Whedonverse characters have a dual purpose - they're metaphors but they've got a physical presence, too - a presence which physically affects their surroundings. Vampires represented arrested development and immaturity, but they still had to be dealt with as vampires - there had to be a somewhat consistent framework in which they operated. The same with FE - it might have represented Buffy's darkest self, but it was also depicted as an entity unto itself - an entity older than time and powerful enough to command armies. Its attentions weren't just focussed on Buffy, it was destroying the entire Slayer system around the planet - we saw this happen before our eyes at the beginning of the season. So, when faced with this sort of physical evidence, I don't think it's unreasonable for the audience to expect some sort of coherent explanantion of how it works, even if they already understand the metaphor part of the equation.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> I guess so but -- Ramses 2, 22:52:08 08/15/05 Mon [1] (69.242.120.180)

I think I can understand(at least it works for me) that what looks to be the absolutely worst threat turns out to be something easily defeated by facing it head on and dealing with it. Buffy spends 7 seasons worried about her darkness, she spends a huge chunk of time refusing to examine her issues with her self....huge buildup pointing to her being somehow not quite right. When she finally accepts what she fears most, the fear simply goes away.

I think they did tie the First and Caleb to people's fears and insecurities. As for what it wanted? I actually think the greater failing in the story was making it have a goal. Evil found in the hearts of every man, woman, child and poodle shouldn't need a goal. The fact that it could lead(seduce)people into giving into their strongest fears without being embodied? Not a totally loser idea. Making it want to be able to touch? Maybe it's as stupid as it sounds...or maybe they were trying to say something about Buffy's inability to 'touch', her lack of fire?(Insert shrug:))

I definitely think Wood was being mulled over for a spinoff. I think I read somewhere that he was supposed to be with Faith and Spike. Kennedy always seemed like a hamfisted attempt to placate a group of fans. She certainly didn't seem to be, at least to me, anyone that was being setup to star in a spinoff. Andrew always seemed like the writers attempt to wink and nod and pull the audience in as a part of the story. Andrew definitely made it feel as we were watching a last season, I didn't get spinoff from him.


[ Edit | View ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.