VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:36:48 08/03/05 Wed
Author: Eurydice
Author Host/IP: 141.154.23.82
Subject: No she wasn't
In reply to: silveragent 's message, "Re: Would Dawn have been a better character if she'd been younger?" on 18:44:51 08/03/05 Wed

She was brought in so Buffy would have somebody to be responsible for. Nothing shakes you out of self-centered childhood like having somebody depend on you, although Buffy sure put up a good fight. And Dawn never performed any of the duties of "ordinary girl" Willow - she was never a sounding board or a confidante or a friend - she was always Buffy's little sister who needed to be protected, which was the whole point about chloroforming her and sending her away with Xander in End of Days.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.