VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:18:06 04/04/02 Thu
Author: STONE COLD 3:16
Subject: NO SE PUEDE CRITICAR A UN LUCHADOR POR LOS COMBATES QUE GANA O PIERDER

HERMANOS EN EL COMENTARIO QUE PUSO FREKAZOID DE QUE HHH ES EL MEJOR MUCHOS DIJIERON QUE A GANDO TANTO Y LA ROCA TANTO Y AUSTIN TANTO Y HOGAN TANTO

SOLO ACUERDENSE DE ESTO LOS COMBATES ESTAN ARREGLADOS Y ELLOS SABEN QUIEN VA A GANR ELLOS HACEN LA LUCHA QUE LES PIDEN

ES COMO EN EL HARDY VS HARDY VINCE LES PIDIO QUE SU LUCHA FUERA CON MUCHOS LANCES Y HACI LA HICIERON Y LOS HISTORIADORES DECIDEN QUIEN GANA ES COMO EL ROCK VS HOGAN = VENCEDOR HOGAN PERO LOS HISTORIADORES DECIDIERON QUE GANARA LA ROCK

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]



Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.