VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Friday, April 17, 01:52:00pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: Wednesday, February 05, 08:47:33pm
Author: Lij
Author Host/IP: adsl-99-31-13-212.dsl.bltnin.sbcglobal.net / 99.31.13.212
Subject: I too agree that ....
In reply to: Chani 's message, "I'm being stubborn" on Wednesday, February 05, 04:57:27am

......that the idea that Moriarty is another Holmes possibly via the father or mother (the 'hot' one) is rather too easy an explanation. As I said above, I hope that they have a more intriguing reveal for us.

Perhaps I am being 'sexist' concerning the possible 3rd Holmes. My point, however, is if I am (wrong about the gender) then what future roll could this other Holmes play? She would have to be, if not in fact male and Moriarty, another psychopath, much worse that Sherlock (who I don't see as a psychopath - even if 'high-functioning'). Something had to have happened to this person.

We can speculate 'till the cows come home, but the producers and writers of Sherlock have it all in their hands.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> Here is what Moffat says about Sherlock -- Chani, Thursday, February 06, 04:41:26am (89-156-8-80.rev.numericable.fr/89.156.8.80)

It's from an interview on vulture.com about Sherlock's best man speech:

As Moffat puts it, that’s merely Sherlock “bullshitting.” “He always is. He doesn’t think that at all. He doesn’t think any of those things, but he wants to think that he does, just as he wants to think he’s a high-functioning sociopath,” says Moffat. “He’s not a sociopath, nor is he high-functioning. He’d really like to be a sociopath. But he’s so fucking not. The wonderful drama of Sherlock Holmes is that he’s aspiring to this extraordinary standard. He is at root an absolutely ordinary man with a very, very big brain. He’s repressed his emotions, his passions, his desires, in order to make his brain work better — in itself, a very emotional decision, and it does suggest that he must be very emotional if he thinks emotions get in the way. I just think Sherlock Holmes must be bursting!”

As for "the other one", yes something happened to that person and they all know it in Mycroft's circle, so it must be related to a State issue.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Yes! And I agree with your criticism on LJ ;-) -- Lij, Thursday, February 06, 07:14:27am (adsl-99-186-236-105.dsl.bltnin.sbcglobal.net/99.186.236.105)


[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.