VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:15:20 04/19/04 Mon
Author: 旺財
Subject: 飛駿寶如果全程按韁回來, 比世紀之駒多加十分我無異議. 但明顯以取勝距離及姿態來說, 飛駿寶多讓六磅世紀之駒絕對有機會反先. 如果飛駿寶加廿分, 世紀之駒加十四分亦不為過. 如果飛駿寶贏兩三個馬位, 另作別論, 但現時根本無任何論據証明飛駿寶可多讓世紀之駒十分, 除了"技術擊倒"這主觀意見外. 精英大師第二定第三仗取勝時姿態輕鬆時間出眾 (55.7秒), 明知佢係馬王級數, 咁唔通要加五十分? 閣下抨擊評磅員時, 是否應提出更有力的理據? 如果如閣下所言, 贏一頸位令頭馬比二馬多加十磅, 這才是真正的不公平.
In reply to: kk 's message, "是否技術擊倒還有保留，不是嗎！有時間請版主先生再去看此場馬過程．另外，我想飛駿寶可克服咁多難度，加佢二十分亦不會太多人會出聲吧．" on 03:04:12 04/18/04 Sun


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

  • 另, 閣下說以姿態及難度比較, 認為飛駿寶值加廿分以上! 這說法小弟極有保留. 1. 姿態不見得特別輕鬆 (精英大師是真正輕鬆, 呢隻又鞭又推贏o個少少). 2. 難度方面, 更說不過去. 評磅制度本意, 就是兩匹馬之實力差距, 可用讓磅拉回均勢. 如果兩匹 3 歲馬分數差 20 分, 一匹負 133 磅, 一匹負 113 磅, 理論上勝出譏會參半, 不能說前駒要勝出的難度高一點. 而且, 跑短途, 133 磅不算什麼. 以往的新馬賽, 未贏過的負 126 磅, 贏過的負 133 磅, 一樣大把馬連贏兩場插班. (NT) -- 旺財, 16:30:53 04/19/04 Mon
    Forum timezone: GMT+8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.