Re: 大遊行??? -- 經國濟世

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:38:14 07/02/03 Wed
Author: 00:33
Subject: Re: 大遊行???
In reply to: 's message, "大遊行???" on 20:51:58 06/30/03 Mon

//誠然，政府太霸王硬上弓嘞，23條立法是太倉卒了!!
反還反，請顧及公眾利益.....//
當反廿三所帶來的利益大於某些公眾利益(交通暢順﹑一天的生意等)便合理

//每次聽到遊行的消息都非常反感//
那麼閣下有何高見？

//對於不同意見的表態也十分欣賞、認同
總是不明白要封呢度、封嗰度\r
阻塞交通，影嚮商鋪營業//
閣下應該知道不封容易造成意外吧？歸根究底還是反遊行。

//示威人士或團體為了宣示公義
和爭取自身之利益
在繁忙鬧市裡
卻損害了公眾利益(司機乘客商店老板職員
也是公眾一份子)
公義??公眾??//

某些人的利益比公義重要？不如直接(以事論事的)說說那些團體的「公義」有甚麼問題吧？再者，這些多數是影響一天而立法影響深遠。

//既然遊行示威是一種象徵意義的表態
無論在哪裡舉行
傳媒總會採訪而給大眾知道
何不為了減少對公眾或社會傷害
另選其他地方舉行呢??
(例如廣闊車少的西隧公路之類
只是打個譬如而已。)//

去隧道遊行是不可行的，主要是空氣流通和急救問題
去效野也不好，破壞自然環境
去商場呢？太易混亂，空氣也不流通
去私人住宅區呢？製造噪音影響他人
所以最好還是在商業區的馬路上遊行

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

旁觀者不得e牙鬆鋼 -- 丞相, 01:12:18 07/02/03 Wed
- Re: 旁觀者不得e牙鬆鋼 -- 萬仙伏首, 11:37:03 07/02/03 Wed
  - 支持修改不支持反23 -- 淇少俠, 16:20:18 07/02/03 Wed