VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:20:11 07/06/03 Sun
Author: 02:14
Subject: Re: 哈,哈哈,哈哈哈
In reply to: 萬仙伏首 's message, "Re: 哈,哈哈,哈哈哈" on 11:16:41 07/02/03 Wed

//23條 我是支持的//
我原則上支持
//所謂的傳媒道德 新聞自由 只是招攬生意的幌子
傳媒背後 還不只是一堆瘸朽的資本家控制?//

有甚麼理由指資本家是「瘸朽」?有沒有「不瘸朽的資本家」?
如果是前者,請論證為何「在背後控制傳媒」的就**只是**他們;
如是後者,請論證「不瘸朽的資本家不可能在背後控制傳媒」
最好有實質例子。

//早期東週裸照事件……東週也可以駁一句:人們有知情權啊~~//
這是「泛人權主義」的問題,不見得有甚麼人非要有這想法、非有這種主義不可。

//那些傳媒披露國家的私穩和機密 怎麼沒人跑出來說天地不容?//
舉例似乎有點不當,有時(相信是大部份情況)傳媒是為了「公眾利益」,這算甚麼「天地不容」?

//知道歷史上的中途島戰役嗎?……

這就是傳媒 他們的目的 只有錢!!//
兩個例子就推論出這個?以偏概全得很!

在下我從來不是甚麼主義的盲從者。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.