[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234[5]678910 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:31:54 10/30/06 Mon
Author: skpe (I agree)
Subject: Re: Buffy as influential figure
In reply to: OnM 's message, "Re: Buffy as influential figure" on 19:22:22 10/26/06 Thu

The list seems totally arbitrary. It has Shakespeare's Hamlet but leaves out MacBeth, (and I would think that most of Shakespeare's characters for there literary merit as well as having been around for 400 yeas would have far more influence than most of this list). No characters from the Commedia dell'arte (such as Scaramouch and harlequin). It includes Madame Butterfly but leaves out Turandot and Tosca. Then it mixes people with groups, ‘The American Cowboy'. And I thought Jim crow was a series or racist laws in the south not a person

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.