Re: While looking for work, I came across this ... -- Talk of the Town---KC

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2 ]

Subject: Re: While looking for work, I came across this ...

Author:
GC

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:50:26 04/17/01 Tue
In reply to: Relo from StL 's message, "While looking for work, I came across this ..." on 10:40:39 04/17/01 Tue

Oh, these are good!! Years ago I fell into the following category:

>16. "Candidate said he really didn't want to get a job, >but the unemployment office needed proof that he was >looking for one."
>> Relo: I suppose he thinks that $320 per week for 26 weeks will allow him to retire comfortably?

As a Seasonal employee (years ago) I remained on call, could be off anywhere from 1 week to 3 weeks. Didn't know unemployment paid so much.....I recieved $136.00 per week. Mo requires you turn in something like 5 job queries to qualify for the unemployment. Think the last year I was a seasonal, the company "finally" gave me a return to duty date. That bypassed the job query requirement.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]