Re: 卷二作用之我見 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Fri, Jun 07 2024, 19:22:31

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: 卷二作用之我見

Author:
阿呆...

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:36:06 12/12/03 Fri
In reply to: 你估下先? 's message, "卷二作用之我見" on 22:16:47 12/11/03 Thu

沒有了範文
是不是要學校/老師/學生自己去找東西讀呢?
不過這樣也好...比較自由
也可以鼓勵自學精神

小鴨在被「填」前終於可以自己去找點東西吃了...

不過要改的，應該還有「中國歷史科」吧!
好像同一段歷史重複教三次，(f1-3,f4-5,f6-7)感覺很浪費時間
初中階段又只教一部份，又使之後沒有修中史的同學產生錯誤想法
好像中一說秦皇島「焚書坑儒」，又沒有說清楚
很容易使同學以為所有書都沒有了，死傷可能破萬
但其實燒的只是非秦國史書、詩書一類等
(不過仍是鉗製思想的手法)
而殺的也只是四百多名方士和儒生
而那些方士也是佔大多數的...
不知道現在的書有沒有改善呢?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]