九濟堂已死 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Fri, May 24 2024, 3:37:16

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9, 10 ]

Subject: 九濟堂已死

Author:
秋(02-03 f7畢業)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:36:07 10/23/03 Thu

懷念以前0既九濟堂

雖然以前大家都會鬧阿sir,仲有時都幾離譜下,但係大家都只係會針對一d公認唔掂0既老師,縱然過火,但不失大是大非的原則,有時更加大快人心.而且,以前好少獨沽一味狂鬧老師,而係有好多其他學術探討或者係一d有關學校趣聞0既話題,內容多元化之餘,更吸引0左好多老師一齊討論,成為一個除0左濟記之外師生互相交流的地方

依家0既九濟堂可以話係不知所謂,唔知濟記呢幾年收埋d咩學生,成班人好似紅衛兵咁,係阿sir miss都批鬥一餐,夠膽死連根叔,方sir呢d好老師都話佢地呢樣唔掂,0個樣唔好.我諗佢地點都唔會0係一兩年內由好變差掛?佢地都唔好咁濟記仲邊有好老師?依家濟記d學生有乜依郁就無限上綱,將九濟堂當作其私家廁所,將所有雞毛蒜皮0既怨氣發洩晒出0黎,嚴重污染0左呢度0既良好氣氛,非常之無公德心.

我對0個d鬧阿sir miss的同學非常之失望,佢地鬧阿sir本應無錯,不過佢地0既留言同d三歲0既小朋友無分別.辭不達意就唔在講,最不知所謂0既係佢地0個種鬧人方式,基本上佢地係對人不對事,因為唔like阿sir,就一下子將佢0既所有0野都話佢唔0岩,又話佢吸煙會教壞人呀,過馬路唔睇交通燈呀都講一餐,十足十一d小學生嗌交.仲有,個阿sir講書你get唔到就話係佢廢,又唔諗下係唔係自己死蠢聽唔明,唔明上堂又唔問,落0左堂番到屋企就0係九濟堂口諸筆伐,以假名去抹黑阿sir,以為阿sir唔知道,又無得回應,等自己獲得一絲快感,從而掩飾自己的挫敗感和自卑感

依家九濟堂已經淪為一d低劣學生洩慾的地方,而阿sir已不再在此作出回應,九濟堂已失去其意義,古語有云:士可殺,不可辱,希望堂主將九濟堂作個了斷,不要令它再被人蹂躪

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Subject: Re: 九濟堂已死
Author: 華 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 07:33:34 10/23/03 Thu 對了

[> Subject:

Re: 九濟堂實仲未死,但濟記傳統已死

Author:
堂主
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:01:09 10/23/03 Thu

士可殺,不可辱. 哈哈,好在這裡是自己人關埋門的地方.辱最多辱番聖芳濟自己.
我承認本人不能廿四小時全程監察九濟堂,兼不能好似言論審查般把任何一字一句也審計得清清楚楚的確是本人的不足之處!
但要弄至這樣才可以維持得到九濟堂運作的話,我倒懷疑聖芳濟是否那個仍保存著波子佬和40周年般的良好傳統的濟記.亦失去了九濟堂的意義.我依然相信濟民本心是好的.
我亦想問一問濟記近兩,三年口口聲聲什麼理念化教育,培養閱讀風氣,多完化培訓.但訓練出來的同學不少連基本禮貌,思辨和語文表達能力也欠捧.與我們一代經歷過四十周年,在所謂唱潮州歌文化下成長的濟民比更是相形見拙.
從九濟堂的留言紀錄可見在九濟堂留言的絕非局限於個別的同學.而是涉及整體的.
請問到底現今的教育教了新紀完下的濟記學生些什麼?
請在九濟堂話我見死不救,唔知做咩,整到要佢可憐九濟堂先來留言的人在斥責我前請先清楚反思和解答這問題.

不過現在的濟民也蠻聰明,懂得把一些不當的言論先備份.即使遭我刪去後仍可以稍後重貼.的確是比以前的師兄有~進步!
畢竟我依然相信濟民本心是好的, 只是有關發表意見方面的教化不足.

暫時關站是治標不治本的,即使是以往九濟堂因技術問題而停了數天(當時正剛有人吵架),無可否認重開後的確有改進,卻只維持了數天又故態復萌.

至於某位對討論區存有偏見的老師,早在一,兩年前九濟堂紀律很好時竟然在課堂上斷章取義,在底年級同學前以老掉牙的濟記大監獄文章,說人家把自己強代入一宗報章上非禮案的被告,以說明非官方討論區根本是抹黑教師和學校的地方之事......算了,除非他是希特勒或毛澤東,否則一個人的言論絕不可影響過半濟民,這是大家的責任.
我依然相信濟是有獨立思考的.

我是不會這麼容易投降,兼宣佈濟民不值得響受言論自由.我依然相信濟民本心是好的.但大家真的認真要好好反思!
敗壞九濟堂不是最傷,敗壞聖芳濟傳統才是最傷.

有意者大可以把這文章反覆觀看什至給校方高層和理念友看看.記著留意依然兩字,有含意的.

[> Subject: Re: 九濟堂已死
Author: ax [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 18:58:45 10/23/03 Thu 而家好似文革咁做親咩都俾人批判..............一一"

[> Subject: Re: 此SARS再來之先兆也
Author: ! [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 20:59:37 10/23/03 Thu

[> Subject: Re: 九濟堂已死
Author: Xaverian [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 12:58:21 10/29/03 Wed but.......... can reuse again

[> Subject: Re: 九濟堂已死
Author: PERSON [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 06:18:14 10/30/03 Thu 車！你冇聽過咩‧‧‧ <<香港人特性>> x <<聖芳濟特性>> = 現在聖芳濟一條幾好既equality (john ng教架，我記得，幾勁！)